Precipitation Suppression through Cloud Seeding: A Review of Technology and Potential Application for Flood Mitigation in Jakarta

Abstract

As climate change intensifies extreme precipitation, many tropical megacities face escalating flood risk that infrastructure alone struggles to contain. Weather modification specifically the deliberate suppression or redistribution of rainfall through cloud seeding has been proposed as a supplementary emergency measure. This paper reviews the scientific basis of precipitation suppression technologies (overseeding, premature rainout, and hail suppression) and examines their operational history, most notably China’s event-based rain reduction and Indonesia’s recent attempts to shield Jakarta from catastrophic floods. Using Jakarta as a case study, we assess the physical feasibility, verification challenges, transboundary risks, and governance requirements of such interventions. We find that while the underlying microphysics is well understood and glaciogenic seeding can demonstrably moderate convective rainfall under suitable conditions, no robust evidence yet exists that urban flood peaks can be predictably reduced. Indonesia’s own ad‑hoc operations have yielded inconclusive results and underscore the urgent need for rigorous, transparent evaluation protocols. The paper concludes that precipitation suppression should not be viewed as a substitute for structural flood defence but could merit controlled research under a binding regional governance framework that addresses liability, equity, and environmental monitoring.

Keywords: precipitation suppression, cloud seeding, flood mitigation, Jakarta, environmental governance, weather modification

1. Introduction

Flooding is the most frequent and costly natural disaster globally, and climate change is making extreme rainfall events more intense in many regions (IPCC, 2021). Low‑lying coastal megacities in the tropics are particularly exposed: rapid urbanisation, land subsidence, and inadequate drainage converge with heavier downpours to produce recurrent, often lethal inundation. Jakarta, Indonesia, exemplifies this nexus. In January 2020, record rainfall triggered floods that killed over 60 people and displaced hundreds of thousands (World Bank, 2021). Even colossal infrastructure projects, such as Jakarta’s sea wall and river normalisation programme, will take decades to complete, leaving the city vulnerable for the foreseeable future.

In this context, some governments have turned to a controversial, century‑old idea: deliberately modifying clouds to reduce rainfall in real‑time. Weather modification – the intentional alteration of cloud microphysics to either enhance or suppress precipitation – has a long civilian and military history. While most operational programmes aim to increase water supply, a parallel but much less publicised set of techniques attempts to dampen heavy rain or shift it away from vulnerable areas. This paper critically reviews the scientific and operational status of precipitation suppression, with a particular focus on its potential relevance to Jakarta. We ask: (1) what technologies exist for reducing rainfall intensity? (2) What evidence supports their effectiveness? (3) What challenges – technical, legal, ethical – would arise from deploying them in a complex, transboundary urban setting? And (4) what governance framework would be needed to proceed responsibly, if at all?

2. Scientific Basis of Precipitation Suppression

Cloud seeding for rain reduction exploits the same microphysical principles that underpin rain enhancement, but the seeding agent, timing, and dosage are manipulated to achieve the opposite effect. Three main approaches have been tested or operationally deployed.

2.1 Glaciogenic Overseeding

In clouds containing supercooled liquid water (temperatures between 0°C and roughly –20°C), the natural scarcity of ice nuclei allows a few ice crystals to grow rapidly at the expense of water droplets, eventually becoming large snowflakes or raindrops. Overseeding injects an excessive concentration of artificial ice nuclei (typically silver iodide) into such a cloud. The result is a “competition” among countless small ice crystals, none of which can grow to precipitation size; instead, they remain suspended or melt into drizzle. This technique was first explored in the 1960s and is the physical basis for operational hail‑suppression programmes (Dessens et al., 2016). By limiting hailstone growth, these programmes also reduce the intensity of convective rainfall pulses.

2.2 Premature Rainout (Cloud Exhaustion)

If heavy seeding is applied on the upwind flank of a storm, precipitation can be forced to fall before the system reaches a protected area, depleting the cloud’s moisture content. This strategy was famously employed by China during the 2008 Beijing Olympics: aircraft and rockets seeded clouds on the city’s perimeter, claiming a 25–30% reduction in rainfall over the Olympic venues (Guo et al., 2009). The method works best when the target area is downwind of a large water body or unpopulated land, where early rainout causes minimal harm.

2.3 Hygroscopic Seeding of Warm Clouds

Many tropical deluges occur in clouds that are entirely above freezing. In these warm clouds, precipitation formation depends on droplet collision‑coalescence. Introducing fine salt particles (e.g., sodium chloride) can broaden the droplet spectrum and accelerate coalescence, potentially causing rain to initiate earlier – again a form of premature rainout. However, control is far more difficult, and no rigorous field experiment has demonstrated reliable rain suppression from warm‑cloud seeding (Rosenfeld et al., 2014). The technique is used mainly for rain enhancement, not suppression.

Across all methods, a fundamental limitation applies: seeding cannot create or destroy moisture; it can only alter the timing, location, and intensity of precipitation that would have fallen anyway. Consequently, suppression efforts are constrained by the availability of seedable clouds and the natural dynamics of the storm.

3. Historical and Current Operational Programmes

3.1 China’s Event‑Based Rain Reduction

China operates the world’s largest weather modification infrastructure, employing tens of thousands of personnel, aircraft, rockets, and ground generators (Ma & Wang, 2022). While most operations target rain enhancement and hail suppression, the system has repeatedly been tasked with rain reduction for major political events. For the 2008 Olympics, a coordinated effort involving 18 aircraft, 1,100 rockets, and real‑time satellite guidance was mounted to seed approaching clouds upwind of the city (Guo et al., 2009). Official evaluations claimed that precipitation was reduced by 25–30% in the protected zone. Similar operations were conducted for the 2014 APEC summit and the 2021 Communist Party centenary. Independent verification of these claims is difficult because the data are not fully public, and the counterfactual – what would have happened without seeding – cannot be observed directly. Nonetheless, China’s repeated use of the technique signals a high degree of institutional confidence, if not rigorous proof.

3.2 Hail Suppression as a Rainfall Moderator

Long‑standing hail suppression programmes in France (ANELFA), Austria, Russia, and parts of the Balkans provide a secondary benefit in smoothing convective rainfall. ANELFA operates 850 ground‑based silver iodide generators and has maintained a statistically evaluated network since the 1950s. Dessens et al. (2016) reported a 40% reduction in hail energy in protected areas, accompanied by a measurable decrease in the intensity of heavy rainfall bursts. Although the primary goal is crop protection, these programmes demonstrate that operational overseeding can persistently modify storm precipitation characteristics over large areas.

3.3 Indonesia’s Emergency Operations for Jakarta

Indonesia has its own history of weather modification, originally developed for forest fire suppression and agricultural water supply (BPPT, 2020). In response to the catastrophic Jakarta floods of 2013, 2014, and particularly January 2020, the Agency for the Assessment and Application of Technology (BPPT, now integrated into the National Research and Innovation Agency, BRIN) mounted emergency cloud‑seeding operations. Aircraft sprayed salt particles over the Sunda Strait and Java Sea, aiming to trigger rain before the clouds reached the city. During the 2020 event, operators reported that seeded clouds did produce rainfall offshore, but the volume and spatial distribution of the reduction over Jakarta were ambiguous (Setiawan & Hidayat, 2021). Radar analyses later suggested that while some convective cells were weakened, the overall storm system was too large and dynamic for the seeding to significantly alter the flood outcome.

4. The Jakarta Context: Flood Risk and Cloud Climatology

4.1 Flood Vulnerability

Jakarta sits on a deltaic plain, crossed by 13 rivers, with over 40% of its land area below sea level. Land subsidence, caused by groundwater extraction, proceeds at 1–10 cm per year in some districts, exacerbating coastal and fluvial flooding (Abidin et al., 2011). Extreme rainfall events are driven by the northwest monsoon (December–February) and by mesoscale convective systems that can deliver more than 150 mm of rain in a single day. The January 2020 event, for example, saw 377 mm recorded at Halim Perdanakusuma Airport on 1 January, the highest single‑day rainfall since record‑keeping began in 1866 (World Bank, 2021). Conventional flood management – including the Jakarta Flood Canal, retention basins, and planned sea wall – is underfunded, partially constructed, and overwhelmed by the pace of development.

4.2 Cloud Regimes and Seeding Opportunity

Jakarta’s heaviest rains are associated with deep convective clouds that often extend above the freezing level, thus containing significant supercooled liquid water in their upper portions. This presents a glaciogenic seeding window. Additionally, the city’s proximity to the Java Sea offers a natural upwind zone where premature rainout could be forced with minimal human impact. During the northwest monsoon, onshore winds carry moisture‑laden air masses over the sea before they reach the city, creating an operational corridor of roughly 50–100 km. Ground‑based radar and satellite climatology confirm that seedable, mixed‑phase clouds are present on a significant fraction of high‑rainfall days (Hidayat & Setiawan, 2020). In theory, therefore, both overseeding and premature rainout could be attempted.

4.3 Review of Indonesian Operations: Results and Challenges

The BPPT/BRIN operations in 2020, though courageous, highlighted the practical difficulties. Aircraft flew dozens of sorties, dispersing tens of tons of salt. Preliminary numerical simulations by Setiawan and Hidayat (2021), using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model coupled with a seeding parameterisation, indicated that under idealized conditions, seeding could reduce rainfall over Jakarta by 10–20% if the cloud systems were of moderate size. However, the actual January 2020 storms were exceptional in scale and intensity, making it impossible for a few aircraft to treat a sufficient fraction of the cloud field. Moreover, the absence of a pre‑agreed evaluation design meant that post‑event attribution relied on modelling alone, without a randomised control. This experience underscores both the physical potential and the severe operational constraints of using weather modification for flood mitigation.

5. Feasibility Assessment

5.1 Technical Feasibility

The core microphysics of glaciogenic overseeding is well established, and hail suppression programmes provide a real‑world demonstration that storm precipitation can be persistently altered. However, scaling this from hail reduction (where the target is the growth of large ice particles) to flood‑causing rain rates (where the total liquid water flux must be significantly reduced over a large area) is a giant leap. The volume of water in a major tropical storm is immense; a single cumulonimbus cloud can hold several hundred kilotons of liquid water, whereas a seeding aircraft can only treat a small portion of its inflow. Recent cloud‑resolving modelling studies suggest that for substantial rain reduction over a city the size of Jakarta, dozens of aircraft would need to be simultaneously deployed, making the operation logistically and financially comparable to a small military campaign (Flossmann et al., 2019). Furthermore, the verification problem proving that suppression actually prevented a flood remains unsolved. Without a carefully designed randomised experiment, any claim of success is open to statistical challenge.

5.2 Transboundary and Legal Issues

The 1977 Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques (ENMOD) bans the use of weather modification as a weapon but does not regulate peacetime civilian operations. Nevertheless, altering rainfall patterns in a region shared by multiple nations raises diplomatic concerns. Jakarta’s rain systems often traverse the Sunda Strait, which is adjacent to Singapore and Malaysian airspace; a large‑scale seeding operation could be perceived as “stealing” water from neighbouring countries, even if the physical effect is negligible. The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) has no treaty on weather modification, and Indonesia’s domestic regulations are limited to operational guidelines (BPPT, 2020). Any move toward routine suppression would require at least a bilateral agreement between Indonesia and its nearest neighbours, along with a transparent, independently monitored protocol.

5.3 Ethical and Social Dimensions

Public perceptions of weather modification are mixed. In Indonesia, cloud seeding for rain enhancement during drought or forest fires is generally well received, but when it is used to divert rain, questions of fairness arise. Farmers in upstream areas might welcome additional rainfall induced by premature rainout, while those downwind, potentially including other communities on Java’s north coast, could suffer unintended dryness. Even within Jakarta, if suppression is perceived to have failed (or to have caused a drought later), public trust in government agencies could be damaged. Ethically, the asymmetry of who benefits and who bears the risk must be openly discussed. Without broad social licence, operational suppression programmes are likely to provoke opposition and litigation.

6. Toward a Governance Framework for Precipitation Suppression

Jakarta’s circumstances are so dire that ignoring any potential tool seems imprudent, yet deploying a tool with such large unknowns is equally risky. A responsible path would be to embed weather modification research within a robust governance framework, rather than using it as an emergency reflex.

First, any future operations should be designed as part of a randomised, controlled evaluation. International best practice (WMO, 2017) recommends that a baseline of historical flood events be established, and that seeding decisions be randomized on a suitable time‑scale (e.g., per storm) so that a statistically sound comparison can be made. Only such a design can isolate the seeding effect from natural variability. Indonesia would benefit from partnering with experienced meteorological agencies (e.g., the U.S. National Center for Atmospheric Research, or the UAE’s Rain Enhancement Program) to design and implement the experiment.

Second, a regional protocol on weather modification should be negotiated among Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore. The protocol could be modelled on the 1992 UNECE Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context, requiring prior notification, environmental impact assessment, and mutual agreement on compensation mechanisms for any proven harm. Even if the probability of cross‑border effects is low, the political signal of a binding agreement would reduce suspicion and build confidence.

Third, suppression must be integrated into, not substituted for, conventional flood management. The primary investment must remain in drainage, retention, and subsidence control. Weather modification could serve as a temporary, low‑probability supplement during extreme events, akin to a flood barrier that is only deployed in a crisis. Its use should be triggered by a clear protocol: when a forecast exceeds a predefined threshold (e.g., >150 mm in 24 hours), and when meteorological conditions are suitable, seeding could be activated. Post‑event, an independent panel would evaluate performance and release the data publicly.

7. Conclusions

Precipitation suppression through cloud seeding is not science fiction; it is a mature technology in microphysical terms that has been operationally used for hail suppression and, in China, for event‑based rain reduction. For a flood‑prone city like Jakarta, the physical opportunity exists – seedable, supercooled clouds frequent the monsoon season, and an upwind ocean offers a relatively harmless rainout zone. Yet the leap from theoretical feasibility to practical flood mitigation is enormous. The scale of energy and water involved in a tropical storm exceeds current seeding capacity; verification is methodologically daunting; and the transboundary, ethical, and legal risks are poorly addressed by existing governance frameworks. Indonesia’s own experience in 2020 illustrates both the ambition and the limitations of the approach.

The prudent policy recommendation is not to abandon the idea, but to subject it to the same scientific rigour demanded of any other public safety intervention. A randomised, transparently evaluated research programme, backed by a regional treaty and integrated with comprehensive flood risk management, could gradually answer the open questions. Until then, precipitation suppression should be viewed as a speculative supplement, not a solution.

References

Abidin, H. Z., Andreas, H., Gumilar, I., & Fukuda, Y. (2011). Land subsidence of Jakarta (Indonesia) and its geodetic monitoring system. Natural Hazards, 59(3), 1753–1774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9842-6

BPPT. (2020). Laporan Operasi Teknologi Modifikasi Cuaca untuk Penanggulangan Banjir di Jakarta [Weather Modification Operation Report for Jakarta Flood Mitigation]. Jakarta: Agency for the Assessment and Application of Technology.

Dessens, J., Berthet, C., & Sanchez, J. L. (2016). A review of hail suppression by the ANELFA project. Atmospheric Research, 182, 296–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.08.009

Flossmann, A. I., et al. (2019). Review of advances in precipitation enhancement research. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 100(8), 1465–1480. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0167.1

Guo, X., Fu, D., Li, Z., & Hu, Z. (2009). Weather modification activities for the 2008 Olympic Games. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 90(8), 1085–1099. https://doi.org/10.1175/2009BAMS2625.1

Hidayat, R., & Setiawan, A. (2020). Numerical simulation of cloud seeding for flood mitigation in Jakarta using WRF model. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 572, 012046. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/572/1/012046

IPCC. (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report. Cambridge University Press.

Ma, J., & Wang, Y. (2022). China’s weather modification programme: overview and challenges. Journal of Weather Modification, 54(1), 12–24.

Rosenfeld, D., et al. (2014). Global observations of aerosol–cloud–precipitation interactions. Reviews of Geophysics, 52(4), 750–808. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013RG000441

Setiawan, A. R., & Hidayat, R. (2021). Evaluasi operasi teknologi modifikasi cuaca dalam mitigasi banjir Jakarta: studi kasus Januari 2020 [Evaluation of weather modification technology for flood mitigation in Jakarta: case study January 2020]. Jurnal Meteorologi dan Geofisika, 22(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.31172/jmg.v22i1.567

World Bank. (2021). Jakarta Flood Risk Management: Final Report. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.

World Meteorological Organization (WMO). (2017). Guidelines for the Implementation of Cloud Seeding Programs (WMO-No. 1189). Geneva: WMO.